Free churches are defined as being most often 'home churches'--a smaller, more intimate group of believers that do no ordinarily participate in a 'church' structure that falls under the category of episcopal, presbyterian or congregational. They usually claim (for lack of a better word) to be following a model of Acts 2. This can lead to various advantages and disadvantages. Some of each are outlined below:
ADVANTAGES
- Smaller group
- Easier to 'fit in' to the community (not get lost in a sea of people)
- Models Acts 2 (though arguably we are not ordered to do this, so is it truly an advantage?)
- Allows for deeper personal connections
- Possibility of reaching those who may not be comfortable going to a 'larger/more formal' church
- Possibility of reaching those who may not be able to attend regular Sunday services for various reasons (medical, employment, transportation etc)
DISADVANTAGES
- Small groups limit opportunities for more connection
- Danger of falling into mutually-accepted heresies
- Danger of wandering astray from Christ's teachings if there is no governing/vetting body to submit to or to be held accountable by
- Limited resources for growth
- Limited resources for counselling/pastoral care
- Likely no children's programs or youth programs by which thenext generation can begin to foster realtionships with others their own ages, and begin to learn about the truth of the Gospel together
- Can become a 'clique'
- Can feel off putting to new people who may not feel comfortable meeting in someone else's home